翻訳と辞書
Words near each other
・ "O" Is for Outlaw
・ "O"-Jung.Ban.Hap.
・ "Ode-to-Napoleon" hexachord
・ "Oh Yeah!" Live
・ "Our Contemporary" regional art exhibition (Leningrad, 1975)
・ "P" Is for Peril
・ "Pimpernel" Smith
・ "Polish death camp" controversy
・ "Pro knigi" ("About books")
・ "Prosopa" Greek Television Awards
・ "Pussy Cats" Starring the Walkmen
・ "Q" Is for Quarry
・ "R" Is for Ricochet
・ "R" The King (2016 film)
・ "Rags" Ragland
・ ! (album)
・ ! (disambiguation)
・ !!
・ !!!
・ !!! (album)
・ !!Destroy-Oh-Boy!!
・ !Action Pact!
・ !Arriba! La Pachanga
・ !Hero
・ !Hero (album)
・ !Kung language
・ !Oka Tokat
・ !PAUS3
・ !T.O.O.H.!
・ !Women Art Revolution


Dictionary Lists
翻訳と辞書 辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ]
スポンサード リンク

Free Enterprise Fund v. Public Company Accounting Oversight Bd. : ウィキペディア英語版
Free Enterprise Fund v. Public Company Accounting Oversight Board

''Free Enterprise Fund v. Public Company Accounting Oversight Board'', 561 U. S. 477 (2010),〔http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/09pdf/08-861.pdf〕 was a case decided by the United States Supreme Court on June 28, 2010. The court held, on a 5-4 vote, that the method through which members of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, which supervises compliance with the Sarbanes–Oxley Act, are removed violates the United States Constitution's separation of powers.
The Supreme Court separated this portion of the Act, while keeping the remainder of the rules imposed by the law intact.
Under the Sarbanes–Oxley Act, officers of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) enjoyed dual layers of "for cause" protection against Presidential removal. PCAOB officers could be removed only "for good cause shown" by officers of the Securities and Exchange Commission, who in turn could only be removed by the President for "inefficiency, neglect of duty, or malfeasance in office." These dual layers of limitation on the President's ability to remove PCAOB officers led to separation-of-powers violations. PCAOB officers exercised Executive-branch powers by determining policy and enforcing the laws of the United States. Under the Constitution, Executive power is vested in the President and he or she is tasked to “take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed” by Article II. The Supreme Court reasoned that dual layers of removal protection impeded the President's ability to "take Care" by interfering with his or her ability to oversee the faithfulness of officers who execute the law, such as PCAOB officers.
==See also==

*List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 561

抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)
ウィキペディアで「Free Enterprise Fund v. Public Company Accounting Oversight Board」の詳細全文を読む



スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース

Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.